Archive for May, 2010

Job opportunities abound in agronomy

By Lura Roti

Re-blogged from Agriculture Online

With 3 close friends graduating without jobs and heading to graduate school, South Dakota State University agronomy graduate Kelli Rastede, says she’s glad the major that seemed the best fit for her, is in an industry where demand for new graduates is holding steady.

“I interviewed with about 6 companies and got offers from a few. I ended up accepting a position with Syngenta,” says Rastede, 23, who grew up on a corn and soybean farm near Allen, Nebraska. “I like to keep busy and active. I don’t think I could sit behind a desk all day. I like the hands-on aspect of agronomy, and I get to be outside working with a lot of different producers.”

Her Crops Judging teammate, Kyle Gustafson, had a similar experience. He says it was nice to accept his diploma without worrying about finding a job. The Madelia, Minnesota, farm kid had one waiting for him.

“As an agronomist, like a lot of other agriculture majors, there is a sense of job security — especially in this economy,” says Gustafson, 22, who accepted a crop consultant position with Helena Chemical Company, Marshall, Minnesota. “I interviewed with a lot of big name agronomy companies — Syngenta, Monsanto, Cargill, Land O’Lakes — when it was all said and done, I had 4 offers on the table.”

As a crop consultant, Gustafson will be working with area farmers on a daily basis and will only be a short drive from his family’s crop and livestock farm.

“I’ll be helping farmers maximize the amount of money they are making on their acres. That’s what I’ve always wanted to do,” Gustafson says. “My career dream was to be a basic production agronomist, working directly with farmers.”

Brent Turnipseed, professor of Plant Science and manager of the SDSU Seed Testing Lab says most of his graduates have stories similar to Rastede and Gustafson’s. His students’ career opportunities haven’t been impacted by the more than 8% unemployment nationwide.

“We have more demand than students to fill,” says Turnipseed, who adds SDSU has one of the largest agronomy departments in the nation.

Chris McInteer would agree. As an agronomist and division manager with Crop Quest, St. Marys, Kansas, McInteer says that over the last few years the pool of agronomy applicants has dwindled, making it a challenge for him to fill positions each year.

“The pool has gotten pretty shallow over the last 8 years,” says McInteer, who adds that Crop Quest, a privately owned crop consulting firm, hires about 5 to 6 full-time agronomists and 15-20 interns each year.

He sees a close link between today’s demand for agronomists and farmers’ acceptance of precision ag products.

“I’ve never seen the future brighter than right now for agronomists. Ten to 15 years ago I never heard about a cooperative or dealer having an in-house agronomist. Today, many have more than one on staff. Producers want information on precision ag products,” McInteer says. “It’s not a deal where they don’t know about the technology, but they have questions. With the way commodity prices are, they want to make sure every decision, is the right decision.”

Based on what he’s learned in the classroom and through internships, Gustafson feels prepared to advise producers.

“I feel very prepared to take on the industry with precision agriculture. Through my internships I worked with precision ag with yield mapping software. One thing that I think many people forget is that in our generation, we grew up with the software. When we sat down and started working with it, it was actually easy compared to how it looks,” Gustafson says. “SDSU offered quite a few classes that prepared us for precision agriculture — focusing on precision management — I feel I’m prepared to provide the skills to help producers maximize yields.”

May 31, 2010 at 11:13 am 1 comment

How could this year’s hurricane season affect agriculture?

Written by Rene Pastor

NEW YORK (Reuters) – The worst hurricane season since 2005 could hit hard the main agricultural export region of the United States and hurt various crops growing around the Atlantic basin and Caribbean Sea.

U.S.

The Port of New Orleans, devastated by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and the Port of South Louisiana, some 30 miles upstream from the city, are the main agricultural export ports of the U.S.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on Thursday issued its first forecast for the hurricane season which begins on Tuesday, projecting 14 to 23 named storms, with 8 to 14 developing into hurricanes, 3 to 7 of which could become majors with winds whipping at more than 110 miles per hour.

Grain exporters estimate these southern ports handle up to 70 percent of U.S. grain exports.

Barges use the Mississippi River to haul grain to the Port of South Louisiana where massive grain elevators store them in bins.

From there, ships coming up from New Orleans load the grain for customers spanning from the Middle East to Japan.

New Orleans is also the leading metals port for the London Metal Exchange, with about two dozen warehouses in the area, according to port officials.

Data compiled by the port showed that imports of copper anodes and ingots into its warehouses in the first nine months of 2009 climbed to 162,500 tonnes. That was up 673.11 percent over the same period in 2008.

Zinc ingots and slabs rose to 119,526 tonnes in the first nine months of 2009, up 542.3 percent against the same period in 2008, the port figures showed.

Aside from New Orleans, the port of Houston is also a key exporter of wheat. And there is a major grain elevator in nearby Beaufort, Texas.

The Gulf region is also home to three of the four main coffee ports in the U.S. They would be New Orleans, Houston and the port of Miami. The other one is New York City.

The Folgers coffee processing plant in New Orleans is the biggest in the country and was forced to shut down when Katrina pounded and flooded the city five years ago. Folgers is owned by J.M. Smucker Company.

Around the region, hurricanes can inflict a lot of damage on coffee and sugar crops in Mexico and the Central American countries, industry officials said.

Mexico is a major sugar and coffee grower along with Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Costa Rica.

A storm could also slam into Florida, the leading citrus growing state in the U.S. Three hurricanes ravaged citrus farms in Florida in 2004 and then Hurricane Wilma hit the region in October 2005, badly damaging citrus output.

Indeed, Florida’s citrus has been badly damaged by storms and disease. Before 2004, production averaged well over 200 million (90-lb) boxes. In 2009/10, however, the government estimated the state’s citrus output at 131.6 million boxes.

(Editing by John Picinich)

May 28, 2010 at 3:33 pm Leave a comment

New food-safety rules threaten small, organic farms

By Jane Palmer, Mercury News

Tom Willey is so concerned about food safety he is willing to bet the farm on it.Literally.

Willey and his wife, Densesse, own an organic farm just outside of Madera in the central San Joaquin Valley, where they grow lettuce, carrots, cabbage and nearly 50 other hand-harvested vegetables. They supply 800 local families and West Coast retailers with a year-round supply of fresh produce.

But in the last three years, a dark cloud has gathered over Willey’s farm. He and other organic farmers say stricter food-safety regulations, developed after a cluster of outbreaks of bacterial contamination in spinach and lettuce in 2006, threaten the principles upon which their farms are based.

While Willey already adheres to the voluntary food-safety regulations deemed necessary by the organic farm community, he feels that many of the rules — which include cutting bare buffer zones around crops, using poison to kill rodents and washing produce with chlorinated water — run contrary to growing healthy and safe food.

“Healthy produce cannot be grown in sterile environments,” Willey said. “That’s both ignorant and dangerous.”

Moreover, opponents of the regulations say that the new measures are threatening the livelihood of small-scale and organic farms. Willey, who refuses to adhere to regulations he believes are ultimately harmful, runs the risk of not being able to sell his crops. Other small farms that do comply face burdensome costs.But supporters of the regulations, part of the California Leafy Green Marketing Agreement, argue that all farms should comply in the interests of food safety.

“For the smaller growers, I don’t think it is reasonable to throw up their hands and say it doesn’t apply to us, or we are not the problem or we can never be the problem,” said Trevor Suslow, a food-safety expert and plant pathologist at UC Davis whose research helped form the basis of the regulations.

The incentive for the California agreement was a virulent outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 in spinach grown in San Benito County in 2006. It resulted in the hospitalization of more than 200 people in the U.S. and Canada, and the death of three. The pathogen also claimed another victim: the leafy greens industry.

“Spinach was off the menu nationwide,” said Paul Simonds, spokesman for the Western Growers Association. The outbreak cost the industry $100 million in lost sales as customer confidence in all leafy greens plummeted.

Scrambling to regain its market, major growers instituted the California marketing agreement. Farms such as Lakeside Organic Gardens in Watsonville and Filice Farms in the Central Valley agreed to abide by specified safety regulations and inspections by the California Department of Agriculture.

“My family eats this product, my employees eat this product, so I want to make sure that it is 100 percent safe,” said Kay Filice, owner of Filice Farms in Hollister.

While participation is voluntary, growers representing 95 percent of the market product have signed the agreement. As the major processors of leafy green produce, such as Dole and Fresh Express, will buy only from signatories, many farmers felt they had little choice but to sign.

“I have complied because if I don’t comply, then I won’t have anybody to sell to,” Filice said.

And now, major processors across the U.S. have proposed to take these rules nationwide, creating a National Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement.

“If you have one little outbreak in a product grown in another state, it affects the entire industry,” Simonds said. “We don’t want to take that chance.”

If the marketing agreement were to go national this year under the Department of Agriculture, it would have similar provisions to a food-safety bill now being considered in the U.S. Senate. Brought forward by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the bill addresses food safety across the board — not solely for leafy greens.

Although the impact of the California marketing agreement on food safety is still in question, the impact on small-scale and organic farmers is indisputable.

“The financial costs are gigantic,” said Roger Medina, food-safety manager at Lakeside Organic Farms. One significant added cost, he said, is the labor-intensive process of implementing the regulations.

“It is documentation, documentation, documentation,” Medina said. “The documentation has gone from make sure you have a plan, to make sure you document every sneeze, every cigarette butt you find out there.”

But this is not the only cost that farmers have to bear. According to the Small Farm Center, a Santa Cruz institute that researches the needs of small and moderate scale farms, farmers are losing up to 2 percent of their farmable acreage because they’re required to have a buffer between crops and the surrounding environment. The center also reported that it cost about $11 per acre for some of those farmers to remove the surrounding vegetation, and about $17 per acre to put up fences to keep out wildlife.

One analysis of the leafy green growers in California estimates that each farm now spends an average of $18,000 per year following the agreement, said Charlotte Vallaeys of the Cornucopia Institute, a farm policy research group based in Wisconsin.

While big growers can absorb these expenses, she said, they will be an enormous burden for the smaller farmer.

“It is the farmer, not the consumer, who is bearing the cost of food-safety regulations,” said April England-Mackay of Martin Jefferson and Sons in Marina. “You are still paying a dollar for a head of lettuce this year, as you were six years ago before we ever implemented the extra requirements.”

That’s because leafy green processors, rather than the growers, dictate the market cost of produce. But these same processors leave the cost of meeting the regulations at the farmer’s doorstep.

Opponents to the agreement also question whether it adequately addresses food safety.

To solve food-safety problems, you need to get to the source, Vallaeys said. “There is nothing inherently dangerous about leafy greens,” she said. “They don’t come up with E. coli popping out of their leaves.”

The real culprit is industrial cattle feedlots that are fountains of dangerous pathogens, Vallaeys said. Not addressing animal agriculture as a source of contamination is a serious flaw in the current agreement, she said.

State investigators concluded that the 2006 E. coli outbreak was probably caused by wild boars traipsing through a field of spinach. But opponents of the agreement, such as Jo Ann Baumgartner, director of the Wild Farm Alliance and the Cornucopia Institute, argue that the real source of contamination was never found. She said the infection could easily have come from nearly cattle farms, which were also found to be contaminated with E. coli.

Moreover, Baumgartner says that creating bare buffers around crops to remove animal habitation is detrimental to food-safety goals.

“Farmers are forced to choose between buyer’s demands and stewardship practices that can improve food safety,” Baumgartner said.

UC Davis researchers have shown the vegetation surrounding fields can remove as much as 99 percent of E. coli from surface water, she said.

Suslow, who was instrumental in designing the regulations in the state’s marketing agreement, now believes refinements should be made to support sustainable farming practices.

Regulations, he said, should be tailored to both the size and the nature of the operation. “Everybody needs to be doing something, but everybody doesn’t need to be doing the same thing,” Suslow said.

Concerned about the disproportionate pressure put on smaller and organic farms, he said: “We must try to be advocates not just for sustainable agriculture but for agricultural sustainability.”

Indeed, Willey of Madera has already paid dearly for his idealism. He has lost his Canadian accounts as the nation’s government prohibits imports of leafy produce from farmers who have not signed on to the marketing agreement. The cost, 5 percent of his income, is not borne easily in today’s economy.

His greater fear is, however, is that a national marketing pact will prevent him from selling his produce in America.

“The organic farming community is kind of in the wings at the moment,” Willey said. “We are shivering in our boots, wondering what is going to happen.”

May 24, 2010 at 11:28 am 1 comment

Ag producers want financial safety net in farm bill

By Alyssa Dizon | AVALANCHE-JOURNAL

Producers from every major agriculture commodity group in Texas told agriculture legislators that provisions of a financial safety net was their common concern for the next farm bill.

Area producers and agribusiness members filled the Texas Tech Museum for the U.S. House Agriculture Committee’s public field hearing on Monday to hear legislators and witnesses discuss the 2012 Farm Bill.

//

A panel of 13 representatives from the cattle, cotton, dairy, peanuts, grain and produce industries addressed the eight committee members and listed their pros and cons of the current 2008 Farm Bill.

The farm bill is reviewed and renewed every five years and creates policy for farm and food programs related to trade, conservation, energy and domestic food programs, among other programs.

“I thought we had good testimony from a very broad range of agricultural interests,” said U.S. Rep. Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas. “It’s important to come out here where agriculture is actually happening.”

The select 13 witnesses submitted written testimonies to the committee and gave five-minute presentations regarding what has and has not been effective for their industries in the current farm bill. The most popular issues mentioned were crop insurance, international trade, environmental challenges and conservation programs.

In each testimony, the thread tying each of these subjects together was money – what can agriculture expect in light of federal budget constraints and how will the new farm bill protect producers’ bottom line.

Most favored the USDA direct and counter-cyclical programs and marketing loan programs under the 2008 bill, which assisted in increasing production input costs and financial stability. Those same individuals cited problems with payment limitations, eligibility standards and complex application processes for some of USDA’s farm and conservation programs.

Brad Heffington, a Lamb County cotton producer, spoke on behalf of Plains Cotton Growers and said funding cuts for programs was not a new challenge to agriculture policy.

“The basic premise of the farm bill is it’s a safety net when times are tough and international trade problems come up,” he said. “You have a safety net to keep food and fiber abundant to our communities and to our consumers.”

With the ever-present threat of natural disasters, witnesses also asked committee members to consider expanding disaster assistance programs to cover more production losses.

Despite those difficulties, Heffington said he was encouraged by the full committee’s presence in Lubbock and its commitment to working with Texas commodity groups.

Lubbock was the seventh national location for the hearings, which began April 30. The committee was in Alabama on Saturday; they have another hearing today in Sioux Falls, S.D.

Chairman Collin Peterson, D-Minn., said the committee began conducting these field hearings early to start drafting the bill next summer and have it ready once the 2008 bill expires.

“My intention is to get this bill out of the house by December of 2011 and try to get this bill done on time,” he said.

Several commodity groups said they would send additional written testimonies to the committee, and Neugebauer encouraged all interested persons to submit their comments online.

May 20, 2010 at 7:36 am Leave a comment

Crying over raw milk: Supporters to rally on Capitol steps

By BILL NOVAK | The Capital Times

 The fight over legalizing raw milk sales in Wisconsin will head to the steps of the state Capitol on Tuesday, as raw milk advocates rally to urge Gov. Jim Doyle to sign a bill passed by the state legislature.

Doyle said in April he was most likely going to sign the bill, but the governor was bombarded last week with opposition to the bill from a wide range of opponents, including doctors, dairies and the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation.

To counter the opposition, raw milk supporters will gather on Tuesday at noon on the Capitol steps, said Bill Anderson, an apprentice cheesemaker and supporter of the raw milk sales bill.

“The best cheeses in the world are made with high quality raw milk from pasture-grazed animals,” Anderson said in an e-mail announcing the rally.

“I believe the dairy industry lobbyists who oppose this legislation do not represent the best interests for the future of the Wisconsin dairy,” Anderson said.

According to the Associated Press, Doyle has until Thursday to act on the bill, or it automatically becomes law without his signature.

The bill, AP said, will allow farmers to sell raw milk directly to consumers through 2011 as studies continue on the issue both this year and next.

Retail sales will not be allowed.

Organic dairy farmer Scott Trautman sold raw milk from his farm until the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection started to crack down on raw milk sales in 2009.

“We take great pride in the quality of the milk we produce, and take cleanliness and food safety very seriously,” Trautman was quoted by Anderson in his e-mail.

But Dr. Paul Wertsch, past president of the Wisconsin Medical Society, said the health of the state’s residents is at stake.

“This is sort of a unique opportunity the governor has, to improve public health by vetoing a bill,” Wertsch said in the AP story.

May 19, 2010 at 7:34 am Leave a comment

New Study: The Benefits of Red Meat

By RON WINSLOW

Maybe that juicy steak you ordered isn’t a heart-attack-on-a-plate after all.

A new study from the Harvard School of Public Health suggests that the heart risk long associated with red meat comes mostly from processed varieties such as bacon, sausage, hot dogs and cold cuts—and not from steak, hamburgers and other non-processed cuts.

The finding is surprising because both types of red meat are high in saturated fat, a substance believed to be partly responsible for the increased risk of heart disease. But the new study raises the possibility that when it comes to meat, at least, the real bad actor may be salt. Processed meats generally have about four times the amount of salt than unprocessed meats.

HEARTBEAT

Processed meats such as bacon and sausage have four times the amount of salt as steak and hamburgers.

In a report that pooled data from 20 different studies from around the world, the researchers found that daily consumption of about two ounces of processed meat was associated with a 42% increased risk of heart disease and a 19% heightened chance of diabetes. By contrast, a four-ounce daily serving of red meat from beef, hamburger, pork, lamb or game wasn’t linked to any increased risk of heart disease. There was, however, a small, but statistically insignificant risk of diabetes.

While the study is far from definitive, researchers said the findings suggest that people, especially those already at risk of heart problems or with high blood pressure, should consider reducing consumption of bacon, processed ham, hot dogs and other packaged meats that have a high salt content. Salt increases blood pressure, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

“The conventional wisdom is that red meats have higher saturated fat and cholesterol levels,” factors that have made all red meats potential culprits in raising the risk of cardiovascular disease, said Renata Micha, a research fellow in the Harvard School of Public Health’s epidemiology department. “But when you try to separate processed from unprocessed meats, you get an entirely different picture.” She is lead author of the study, which appears in Tuesday’s issue of the American Heart Association journal Circulation.

Red Meat Redeemed?

Based on information about meat products sold in the U.S., levels of saturated fats are similar in processed and unprocessed meats, while steak and other red meats have on average slightly higher levels of cholesterol, the researchers found. But sodium levels average about 622 milligrams per two-ounce serving of processed meat, about four times the 155 milligrams found in steak, hamburger or pork. Other preservatives, called nitrites, were also higher in the processed meats. In some studies, nitrates have been shown to interfere with the health of blood vessels and the body’s ability to process glucose.

None of this suggests that steak is a new health food. While red meat wasn’t linked to an increased risk of heart disease in the study, it didn’t lower it either. Other research suggests frequent red meat consumption is associated with increased risk of colon cancer. The new report didn’t look at cancer effects.

“Should people eat more red meat because of this analysis?” asked Robert Eckel, a cardiologist and nutrition expert at University of Colorado, Denver. “I don’t think that is what the study is saying.”

The study was a meta-analysis, which combines the results of several studies looking at the same issue. Like others of its kind, the study “is limited in terms of scientific value,” Dr. Eckel said. None of the studies in the analysis, for example, was a randomized controlled clinical trial, just one factor affecting the strength of the findings. The report is helpful in raising issues for further study, but “it doesn’t answer any questions,” he said.

Nevertheless, Dr. Eckel said, “I was amazed to see the differences in sodium content” between the two categories of meat.” It suggests that people with high blood pressure “might need an [additional] drug” to control their condition if they eat a lot of processed meat,” he said.

The American Meat Institute Foundation took issue with the findings, saying they conflict with national dietary guidelines. “The body of evidence clearly demonstrates that processed meat is a healthy part of a balanced diet,” James H. Hodges, president, said in a statement. He said the study didn’t “achieve the standard threshold that would generate concern” and that “it is no reason for dietary changes.”

Current U.S. dietary guidelines call for limiting saturated fats—the kind found in red meats and dairy products such as milk, cheese and butter—to less than 10% of calories consumed each day—while keeping overall fat consumption to under 30% of calories. A big reason is that saturated fats are associated with higher levels of cholesterol in the blood. Dr. Eckel said that “is still a reasonable recommendation.”

New research on red meat shows that eating steak is okay, just hold off on the sausages and bacon. WSJ’s Ron Winslow discusses.

The report is the second meta-analysis in recent weeks to question just how much of a culprit saturated fats are when it comes to cardiovascular risk. In March, a meta-analysis (involving 21 different studies) by a team headed by Ronald Krauss at Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, Calif., found that intake of saturated fat wasn’t linked to a statistically-significant increased risk of heart disease, stroke or cardiovascular disease.

“There is growing evidence that it’s not which nutrient we eat, but the type of foods we eat that is important,” said Harvard’s Dr. Mozaffarian. “We have to get away from trying to micromanage nutrients and look at the health quality of foods.”

That a good cut of red meat might be healthier than a heavily processed serving of other meat, he added, “is intuitive to most Americans. Maybe the science is catching up with the intuitive sense.”

That’s not necessarily a license to unleash your inner carnivore. Calorie control as well as a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, fish, whole grains and nuts remain the mainstay of heart-healthy eating, he said.

“If once in a while somebody wants to eat meat, our study suggests steak or other unprocessed cuts aren’t going to increase their heart risk,” he said.

Write to Ron Winslow at ron.winslow@wsj.com

May 18, 2010 at 2:33 pm Leave a comment

NYFEA survey

If you haven’t taken the NYFEA survey yet, please do!  If you haven’t attended NYFEA events, we still welcome your responses.  Our goal is to discover the best way for NYFEA to meet the needs of young farmers.

Take the Survey

May 14, 2010 at 11:46 am Leave a comment

Reblog: From Agriculture Proud

Read about other proud ad folks at http://agricultureproud.wordpress.com

Anna-Lisa Smile

May 9, 2010

anna-lisa-smile.blogspot.com Barefoot in the kitchen, boots in my hand, the Old West on my mind. I write about a variety of topics from hot industry topics to cooking and kitchen tips. I am a ranch girl who loves the Lord. I grew up in the foothills of northeastern California on the place my family has ranched since 1903. I am passionate about my heritage and the beef industry. One of my lifetime goals is to tell others our story! The story of producing the safest protein source in the meat case with sustainable practices, dedication and hard work. From the cowboys to the butcher we are families just like yours and we work diligently to bring you a quality product. Give it a shot, suprise yourself and choose beef! Find Anna-Lisa on Twitter (AnnaGiannini).

May 13, 2010 at 12:44 pm Leave a comment

Reblog: What the Consumer Demands, The Farmer Provides

Re-blogged from Farmer on a Mission:

What The Consumer Demands The Farmer Provides

If you’re looking for someone to blame, perhaps you should take a closer look at YOUR food consumption decisions. Clean up your eating habits, and believe me, I will still grow what you demand.

from Farmer On A Mission by Sarah Bedgar Wilson, “Farmer On A Mission”

(Rear view of black less-lard hog, side by side with overweight, white, mostly-lard, hog at Dept. of Agriculture experiment station. Photo by Al Fenn. Life Magazine, October 1954.)

“The agriculture sector is…partly responsible for the explosion in our health care costs because they’re contributing to type 2 diabetes, stroke and heart disease, obesity, all the things that are driving our huge explosion in health care costs.”
- Senator Barack Obama, TIME Magazine, 2008.

Excuse me?!

Here’s a little lesson in economics. When there is a demand for something, the supply increases.

Every time a consumer stands in front of a grocery store shelf and picks “this” product over “that” product, the demand for “this” product increases. This trickles back through the food manufacturers to the farmer eventually, therefore increasing the supply.

We farmers grow only what the consumer demands. For example, My Dad has told me stories of “lard hogs”. Back in the day, the fatter the hog, the better, because every family had a tub of lard to cook with. Then somewhere along the line, consumers began desiring leaner pork, so farmers started breeding leaner pigs. Today, “voila”, the modern hog has the muscle definition of my workout video instructors.

What I’m getting at is that I’m absolutely fed up (pun intended) with so many people blaming farmers for, well, just about everything.

What the consumer demands the farmer provides and we do a darn good job of providing whatever it is consumers demand in a safe, efficient manner.

May 12, 2010 at 10:39 am Leave a comment

The 2010 National Institute in Monterey, CA

If you haven’t seen the National Institute video yet, watch it below!  And the registration form is below that for your convenience!  While in Monterey, we’ll tour Ocean Mist Artichokes, Dole Salad Plant, Gills Onions/Rio Farms, and King City Nursery.

The NYFEA Institute, held annually, serves three major purposes:

May 11, 2010 at 11:38 am Leave a comment

Older Posts


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 15 other followers

Connect with us!

Watch us on YouTube!Connect with us on Twitter!Find us on Facebook!

Twitter Feed

Past posts

May 2010
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.